|
STUDENT CONDUCT CODE
I.
Preamble—General Conduct Policy
II.
Authority and Responsibility
III. Application of Laws and Off-Campus
Activities
IV. Prohibited Conduct
V.
Student Academic Misconduct
VI. Disciplinary Process
VII.
Disciplinary Sanctions
VIII. Appeals
IX. Summary Suspension
X. Disciplinary Files-Retention and Access
XI. Judicial Council
I. Preamble—General
Conduct Policy
Academic institutions
exist for the transmission of knowledge,
the pursuit of truth,
the development of students, and the general
well-being of society.
Free inquiry and free expression are indispensable
to the attainment of
these goals. As members of the academic
community, students
should be encouraged to develop the
capacity for critical
judgment and to engage in a sustained and
independent search for
truth.
Freedom of the
individual may be defined as the right to act or
speak, so long as it
does not adversely affect the rights of others.
Believing in this
concept, Winthrop University will protect freedom
of action and freedom
of speech for both students and
employees, so long as
it is not of an inflammatory or demeaning
nature and does not
interfere with the students’ living and study
conditions and the
administration of its affairs. It shall constitute
a disruptive act for
any member of the campus community to
engage in any conduct
which would substantially obstruct, interfere
with or impair
instruction, research, administration, authorized
use of University
facilities, the rights and privileges of other
members of the
Winthrop community, or disciplinary proceedings.
Moreover, Winthrop
University is committed to improving
the quality of student
life by promoting a diversified educational
and cultural
experience. Therefore, racist conduct or other acts of
bigotry will not be
tolerated.
Rights and freedoms
imply duties and responsibilities. Note
should be taken that a
student who exercises his or her rights as a
private
citizen—whether individually or as a member of a
group—must assume full
responsibility for his or her actions. All
Winthrop students and
employees must abide by local, state, and
federal laws and with
all published University policies and regulations.
Violations of laws and
regulations will subject the perpetrator
to disciplinary action
by the University and/or the appropriate
civil or criminal
court.
II. Authority and
Responsibility
Responsibility for
good conduct rests with students as adult
individuals. Student
organizations have similar responsibility for
maintaining good
conduct among their members and guests and at
activities they
sponsor. Organizations wishing to become chartered
that violate Winthrop
policy or do not fulfill requirements to
be a chartered
organization can still be subject to this conduct
code and possible
restrictions outside the code. Restrictions will
be overseen by the
Program Director of Clubs and Organizations
and monitored by the
Dean of Students office if no formal charges
are brought. All
members of the campus community are expected
to use reasonable
judgment in their daily campus life and to show
due concern for the
welfare and rights of others.
This code is
promulgated in accordance with the policies of the
Board of Trustees of
Winthrop University. The Vice President for
Student Life as the
President’s designee in these matters shall normally
obtain the advice of
the Judicial Council before recommending
changes in rules
governing student rights, responsibilities
and conduct. Under
normal circumstances, the Vice President
for Student Life will
designate the responsibility for the operation
of the Student Conduct
Code to the Department of Student
Affairs, particularly
the Dean of Students. This responsibility
includes formulating
and implementing operating procedures for
the judicial
consideration of conduct violations and the imposition
of sanctions in an
efficient, consistent, fair, legal and educational
manner. The Dean may
further delegate responsibility to various
judicial bodies and
administrative staff.
The President of
Winthrop University is authorized to assign
disciplinary cases to
special hearing committees or officers as the
President deems
appropriate.
III.
Application of Laws and Off-Campus Activities
Winthrop University is
not a sanctuary beyond the reach of the
criminal laws of the
United States, the State of South Carolina,
and the City of Rock
Hill. While the rules and regulations of
Winthrop University
are not meant to duplicate general laws,
there are some aspects
in which the lawful interests of the institution
as an academic
community coincide with the broader public
interest treated in
general laws. Students, or student organizations,
who commit offenses
against the laws of municipalities, states, or
the United States, are
subject to prosecution by those authorities
and may be subject to
disciplinary action under University rules
when their conduct
violates institutional standards. Winthrop students,
or student
organizations are subject to the provisions of this
Student Conduct Code
while on University premises or
University-related
premises, and when involved with off-campus
Winthrop activities.
Students, or student organizations will be
held accountable to
this code for their off-campus activities when
it can be ascertained
the off-campus act has a direct detrimental
impact on the
University’s educational functions. Any disciplinary
action imposed by
Winthrop may precede and be in addition to
any penalty imposed by
an off-campus authority.
IV. Prohibited Conduct
The following
constitutes the official record of general violations
of conduct rules and
regulations at Winthrop University.
Students and student
organizations are expected to abide by these
regulations. These
regulations are not designed to define prohibitive
conduct in exhaustive
terms. Additional rules and regulations
may be adopted and
will be promulgated through campus communication
channels. A student or
student organization that is
responsible for
misconduct or is responsible for being an accessory
to misconduct shall be
subject to the sanctions authorized by
this code. Students
who anticipate or observe a violation of university
policy are expected to remove themselves from participation and are
encouraged to report violations. Areas of
misconduct include:
A. Disruption of
classes, seminars, research projects, or activities
of the University.
B. Actual or
threatened physical assault or injury to persons.
C. Actual or
threatened sexual assault or a sexual misconduct violation
– This includes, but
is not limited to, behaviors described as
actual or threatened
sexual assault, offensive touching, non-consensual
sexual assault,
relationship violence, stalking, or other
sexual misconduct. See
a description of sexual misconduct under
Campus Safety and
Security on page 28 of the
Student Handbook.
D. Harassment and/or
intimidation – Conduct causing alarm or
recklessly creating a
risk by: making unwelcome sexual advances,
or requests for sexual
favors, threatening to commit crimes
against persons or
their property or the face to face use of “fighting
words” by students to
harass any person on University property
or other property to
which the student conduct code applies is
prohibited. ‘‘Fighting
words’’ are those personally abusive epithets
which, when directly
addressed to any ordinary person, in
the context used and
as a matter of common knowledge, are inherently
likely to provoke an
immediate violent reaction, whether or
not they actually do
so. Such words include, but are not limited
to, those terms widely
recognized to be derogatory references to
race, ethnicity,
religion, sex, sexual orientation, disability, and
other personal
characteristics. This also covers harassment or
intimidation of
persons involved in a campus disciplinary hearing
and of persons in
authority who are in the process of discharging
their
responsibilities.
E. Disorderly conduct
— Individual or group behavior which
unnecessarily disturbs
individuals or groups is prohibited. Such
conduct includes, but
is not limited to, unwelcome physical contact,
hazing, and boisterous
or threatening conduct which is unreasonable
for the area, time, or
manner in which it occurs.
F. Drugs — The
manufacture, distribution, sale, use, offer for sale,
or possession of drugs
or narcotics, or drug paraphernalia in
accordance with State
statutes.
G. Behavior or
activities which endanger the safety of oneself or
others — This
includes, but is not limited to, destructive behavior
by individuals and/or
groups; self-destructive behavior; arson;
and tampering,
damaging, or misusing fire equipment.
H. Possession and/or
use of firearms, fireworks, dangerous
weapons and hazardous
chemicals — Winthrop University is
unwilling to allow
even the mere presence of dangerous weapons.
While some objects are
clearly dangerous, what is used dangerously
may also be considered
a weapon.
I. Damage to property
— Damage, destruction, or defacement of
University property or
property of any person as a result of a
deliberate action or
as a result of reckless or imprudent behavior.
J. Theft of property —
Theft of University property or possession
of stolen University
property or property of any person.
K. Misuse of
University documents — Forging, transferring,
altering, or otherwise
misusing any Winthrop document, including
identification cards,
course registration material, or other document
or record.
L. Unauthorized use of
the name or insignia of the University by
individuals or groups.
M. Unauthorized
presence in or forceful entry into a University
facility or
University-related premises.
N. Misuse of telephone
— No student shall make or assist in making
unauthorized or
annoying telephone calls or otherwise misuse
or abuse telephone
equipment.
O. Violations of any
of the restrictions, conditions or terms of any
sanctions resulting
from a previously held disciplinary hearing or
failure to complete
conditions or terms within the designated time.
P. Misappropriation or
misuse of student organization funds or
property — This
includes, but is not limited to, over-extension of
the budget of a
student organization; spending receipts prior to
proper deposit; and
unauthorized personal use of equipment.
Q. Computer abuse —
This includes, but is not limited to, plagiarism
of programs; misuse of
computer accounts; unauthorized
destruction of files;
creating illegal accounts; possession of unauthorized
passwords; and
disruptive or annoying behavior on the
University’s computer
systems.
R. Providing false
information — In the application for admission,
petitions, requests,
disciplinary hearing or other matters of
record and transaction
with officials of Winthrop University.
S. False reporting of
an emergency — The false report of a bomb,
fire or other
emergency in any building, structure or facility by
means of activating an
alarm or in any other manner.
T. Failure to identify
oneself when requested by persons in authority
who are in the process
of discharging their responsibilities.
U. Unauthorized use or
possession of keys — No one may use or
possess any University
key without proper authorization. No student
is allowed under any
condition to have a University key
duplicated.
V. Sale of textbooks —
The sale of a textbook by any student who
does not own the book
is prohibited without prior authorization
from the owner of the
book.
W. Violation of the
University’s alcoholic beverage policy.
X. Violation of the
University’s fund-raising, solicitation, canvassing,
assembly, and poster
policies.
Y. Violation of the
University’s hazing policy.
Z. Violations of the
Residence Hall contract not specifically listed
under Judicial Board
or Residence Life Office jurisdiction.
AA. Violations of
University policies and procedures-Failure to
abide by any published
University policy or procedure is prohibited,
including the General
Conduct Policy.
BB. Unauthorized or
misuse of University property or equipment.
CC. Commission of any
act which is a violation of a criminal law
of the United States.
DD. Violations of the
Academic Misconduct Policy.
V. Student Academic
Misconduct
A fundamental tenet of
all institutions of higher learning is academic
honesty. Academic work
must depend upon respect for an
acknowledgement of the
research and ideas of others.
Misrepresentation of
someone else’s work as one’s own is a most
serious offense in any
academic setting.
Academic misconduct in
any form cannot be condoned.
Academic misconduct
includes but is not limited to providing or
receiving assistance
in a manner not authorized by the professor
in the creation of
work to be submitted for academic evaluation
including papers,
projects, and examinations; presenting, as one’s
own, the ideas or
words of another for academic evaluation without
proper
acknowledgement; doing unauthorized academic work
for which another
person will receive credit or be evaluated; and
presenting the same or
substantially the same papers or projects in
two or more courses
without the explicit permission of the professors
involved. In addition,
academic misconduct involves
attempting to
influence one’s academic evaluation by means other
than academic
achievement or merit. More explicit definitions of
academic misconduct
specific to certain academic disciplines may
be promulgated by
academic departments and colleges.
One who knowingly
cooperates with another in an act of academic
misconduct is an
accessory to that academic misconduct.
Thus a student who
writes a paper or does an assignment for
another student is an
accomplice and will be held accountable just
as severely as the
other. Any student who knowingly permits
another to copy from
his or her own paper, examination or project
shall be held as
accountable as the student who submits the copied
material.
The following
procedural guidelines are to be followed in matters
of alleged academic
misconduct:
A. During the course
of an examination or other exercise, an
instructor or proctor
who observes suspicious behavior such as
copying or collusion
may warn the individuals involved of the
appearance of their
actions and request them to cease immediately.
Continuation of such
behavior can be considered evidence of
academic misconduct.
The professor is not obligated to warn students
beforehand and the
cessation of the suspicious behavior
does not relieve the
student of a later judgment of academic dishonesty.
B. A remarkable
similarity between works supposedly completed
independently that are
submitted for evaluation may be considered
evidence indicating
academic misconduct.
C. When a professor
believes there is sufficient evidence to
demonstrate a clear
case of academic misconduct, the professor
shall notify the
student in writing. Notification should occur within
30 days of discovery
of the academic misconduct. The notice
shall indicate that
unless the student requests a hearing, the professor
shall impose the
appropriate academic consequences warranted
by the circumstances
and that a disciplinary hearing may be
initiated. The
appropriate academic consequence for serious
offenses is generally
considered to be failure in the course.
Students may not
withdraw from a course to avoid an F grade as
the academic
consequence for a violation. For less serious offenses
regarding small portions
of the course
work, failure for that
portion is suggested
with the requirement that the student repeat
the work for no
credit.
The faculty member is
responsible for saving the evidence of
academic misconduct in
its original form and need not return any
of the papers or other
materials to the student. Copies of the student’s
work and information
about other evidence will be provided
to the student upon
request.
D. The student is
given seven days from this first written notice to
respond. If the
student acknowledges responsibility or if the student
does not respond to
the written notice, the academic consequences
shall be imposed by
the professor who will also submit a
report to the Dean of
the college and the Dean of Students.
E. If the professor
requests or if the student has a prior disciplinary
record or unusual
circumstances exist, the Dean of Students
can initiate a hearing
utilizing the regular discipline process as
stipulated in the
Student Conduct Code which may alter the student’s
status with the
University.
F. If a student
chooses to contest the charge of academic misconduct
the student may
request in writing to the professor with a
copy to the Dean of
Students, a disciplinary hearing to determine
the facts of the
alleged misconduct. The Dean of Students shall
initiate the regular
disciplinary process. The purpose of the hearing
is to determine the
student’s responsibility for the alleged academic
misconduct. If the
student is judged by the hearing authority
as stipulated in the
Student Conduct Code to be responsible for
a violation, the
professor shall determine the appropriate academic
consequences within
the course and the hearing authority will
decide what regular
disciplinary sanction, including suspension or
expulsion, will be
imposed. If the hearing authority determines the
student was not
responsible for a violation, no academic consequences
within the course can
be imposed by the professor.
G. The Dean of
Students is responsible for assisting students, professors
and hearing
authorities in matters of process and procedure
associated with
Winthrop’s academic misconduct policy. The
Dean of Students will
inform the Dean of the College in which the
student is enrolled
that the case has been reported and of any final
action taken by the
professor and/or the hearing authority.
VI. Disciplinary Process
All students and
student organizations are subject to the disciplinary
procedures prescribed
in this code. If a student, allegedly
involved in a
violation of the Student Conduct Code, separates or
graduates from the
University prior to resolution, the disciplinary
process can continue
at the discretion of the University. If a hearing
is not pursued upon
the separation of the student, the pending
charges will be
resolved, at the discretion of the University, prior
to any future
readmission.
A. Initiation of
Charges —
The Department of Student Affairs
bears the
responsibility for the initiation of disciplinary procedures
against a student for
alleged misconduct which could result
in expulsion or
suspension from the University. The Department
of Student Affairs
will review instances of reported misconduct to
determine if
disciplinary proceedings should be initiated. Any
member of the campus
community may register a complaint in
writing with the
Department of Student Affairs against a student
for alleged violation
of University policy. In the absence of sufficient
information as
determined by the Dean of Students or
designee, a complaint
will be dismissed.
B. Notification of
Charges –
Once it is determined that disciplinary
proceedings will be
initiated, the accused student or student
organization will be
provided written notification of the charges.
Notification will
specify the alleged violation of this code.
Notification will also
inform the accused student to arrange immediately
a pre-hearing
interview with the Dean of Students or
designee.
If the student does
not arrange for a pre-hearing interview, the
Student Conduct Code
and a letter scheduling a hearing will be
sent to the student.
C. Options for
Resolution of Disciplinary Charges -
It should
be clearly understood
that there is a fundamental difference
between the nature of
student discipline and that of criminal law.
Regardless of the
options exercised for resolution of charges,
the discipline of
students within the University community must
be consistent with the
educational mission of the institution.
At the pre-hearing
interview with the Dean of Students or
designee, the charged
student will have all the disciplinary options
outlined below fully
explained:
1. Plead not
responsible to the charge(s) and have a regular hearing
before the Judicial
Council where a determination of responsibility
will be made. If held
responsible by the Judicial Council,
an appropriate
sanction(s) will be determined.
2. Plead not
responsible to the charge(s) and request an administrative
hearing before the
Vice President for Student Life or
designee where a
determination of responsibility will be made. If
held responsible by
this administrative hearing officer, an appropriate
sanction(s) will be
determined. The Vice President or
designee may decline
to conduct the hearing, in which case the
matter must be heard
by the Judicial Council.
3. Accept
responsibility for the charge(s) and elect for the Judicial
Council to determine
an appropriate sanction(s).
4. Accept
responsibility for the charge(s) and elect for the Dean of
Students or designee
to determine an appropriate sanction(s). The
Dean of Students or
designee may decline to conduct the hearing,
in which case the
matter must be heard by the Judicial Council.
D. Pre-Hearing
Interview -
When the Department of
Student
Affairs determines
that official proceedings will be initiated, the
accused student or
student organization is responsible for arranging
a pre-hearing
interview with the Dean of Students or designee.
The purpose of the
pre-hearing interview is to insure that the
accused will be
sufficiently familiar with the disciplinary process
in order to adequately
prepare and present a response at the hearing.
At this interview the
accused:
1. Will be advised
immediately of the right to decline to make any
statements to avoid
the possibility of self-incrimination. Refusal
to speak or to answer
questions shall not be interpreted as evidence
of responsibility.
2. Will be advised of
the alleged violations and an explanation of
the prohibited conduct
will be provided. The student will be
advised if suspension
or expulsion is possible as a result of the
hearing.
3. Will be advised of
the identity of witnesses or others who will
testify, the general
content of their testimony, and the content of
any written material
or physical exhibit which will be presented at
the hearing. If
additional information or new witnesses are to be
presented at the
hearing, the accused student will be informed at
least three days prior
to the hearing date and the information will
be made available for
the student’s review.
4. Will be advised
that a list of those witnesses requested by the
accused student must
be provided and any written statements by
those witnesses must
be included in the case file three days prior
to the hearing. Any
additional written information must be available
to the Department of
Student Affairs at least three days prior
to the hearing date,
for a determination of relevancy, and to be
included in the case
file for the hearing authority to review.
5. Will be advised
that an advisor may be present at the hearing.
The advisor may not
address the hearing officer or panel or other
persons at the hearing
unless permitted by the hearing officer or
panel. The role of the
advisor will be to consult with the accused
at reasonable
intervals during the course of the hearing.
6. Will be advised to
consult further with the Dean of Students or
designee concerning
any questions or interpretations of procedure.
7. Will be advised
that hearings are scheduled to provide the
accused student a
minimum of five days from the date of notification
of charges (excluding
weekends and holidays) during
which to prepare a
response.
8. Will be advised
that any request for a delay of the hearing must
be in the form of a
written petition to the Department of Student
Affairs, which
schedules hearings and determines whether a delay
will be granted. Such
a delay will not affect the student’s status.
9. Will be advised
that the Department of Student Affairs may
choose to delay the
hearing for good cause. Such a delay will not
affect the student’s
status.
10. Will be advised of
options for resolution of disciplinary
charges.
E. Failure to Respond -
If the
charged student or student organization
has been properly
notified of the charges and hearing date,
and still does not
attend the scheduled hearing, the hearing will be
conducted by the Vice
President for Student Life and a determination
will be made based
upon the available information. The
accused will be
considered properly notified when the formal
charge letter, the
Student Conduct Code and the letter scheduling
the hearing have been
delivered to the student’s address as indicated
in the most current
Student Directory compiled by the
Registrar’s Office.
F. Dismissal of Charges
– If the
Dean of Students or designee
determines as a result
of the pre-hearing interview that insufficient
information exists to
justify a hearing, the charge will be dismissed.
G. Hearing Procedures
1. During a hearing,
the accused student is entitled to:
a. Appear in person,
hear all information presented and present
any relevant
information, call witnesses, and ask questions of witnesses
present at the
hearing.
b. Elect not to appear
at the hearing, in which case the hearing
may be conducted in
the accused’s absence.
c. Refuse to answer
any questions or make a statement; the hearing
authority shall make
its decision solely on the basis of information
presented at the
hearing.
d. Challenge the
presence of a Judicial Council member for cause.
Cause is defined as
personal bias, prior involvement, or inappropriate
access to information
concerning the incident. The removal
of a Judicial Council
member for cause will be at the discretion of
the remaining council
members as determined by majority vote.
e. Confidentiality.
All hearings shall be conducted in private session.
All statements,
information, or comments given during hearings
will be held in the
strictest confidence by members of the
Judicial Council,
University staff, witnesses and advisors before,
during, and after
deliberation. Video, audio, stenographic, or photographic
recording of hearing
proceedings are prohibited, except
as authorized by the
Department of Student Affairs.
2. The hearing
authority will exercise control over the hearing to
avoid needless
consumption of time, repetition of information,
and/or prevent the
harassment or intimidation of participants. The
hearing can be
recessed at any time.
3. All hearings shall
be conducted in an informal manner and
technical rules of
evidence will not be applied. The taking of
statements of
witnesses may be done by discussion, though the
testimony of each
witness may be subject to question and rebuttal.
While written
statements are admissible, the accused shall
have the opportunity
to question and rebut the testimony, unless
extenuating
circumstances preclude this option. Any written witness
statements must be
available in the file for review three days
prior to the hearing
date.
4. Witnesses shall be
present during a hearing only during the
time they are
testifying unless the violation is one in which there
is a specific
individual victim.
5. Cases in which
there is a specific victim include but are not
limited to violations
of sexual misconduct or physical assault. In
such cases, the victim
may be present throughout the hearing and
may also have an
advisor present. Questioning of the victim by
the accused student
will be directed to the Council and the chair
of the Council will
direct the question to the victim.
6. The Dean of
Students or designee is responsible for scheduling,
coordinating, and
presenting all cases.
7. The Dean of
Students or designee will make a tape recording
of all hearings, where
a student pleads not responsible or when a
charged student
requests it. The accused shall have the right, upon
request, to listen to
the recording in the presence of a staff member
of the Department of
Student Affairs. The accused may
request a duplicate
copy of the recording within a period of six
months from the date
of the hearing and must assume the cost of
this expense.
H. Hearing
Decisions
1. Upon completion of
the hearing, the hearing authority shall in
private session
consider the information presented to determine
responsibility or to
drop the charges due to insufficient information.
2. The hearing
authority shall consider only the information presented
at the hearing, and
responsibility can only be determined
by clear and
convincing information.
3. In a Judicial
Council hearing, a majority vote of council members
shall be required to
find the accused responsible and to assign
a sanction. Four
members constitute a quorum. The Dean of
Students or designee
may offer an opinion regarding appropriate
sanctions.
4. If responsibility
is acknowledged or determined, prior to the
determination of the
sanction(s), the hearing authority shall allow
the introduction of
information concerning the past conduct
record of the accused
and a victim impact statement which details
the impact on the
victim the violation caused. The statement may
be written or oral.
These will be provided by the Dean of Students
or designee in the
presence of the accused.
5. If the student
found responsible does not choose to be present,
the student’s prior
record and victim impact statement will be
introduced in his or
her absence.
I. Notification
of the Decision
1. Upon completion of
all deliberations, the hearing authority will
notify the Dean of
Students or designee of the full decision.
2. The written
decision from the hearing authority shall consist of
written confirmation
of the decision including the findings of fact,
the determination of
responsibility, the complete description of
any sanction imposed
or the decision to drop the charge(s) due to
insufficient
information. The hearing authority will generally
send the letter to the
Dean of Students or designee within 24 hours
after completion of
the hearing.
VII. Disciplinary Sanctions
The purpose of
imposing sanctions are twofold: to protect the
University community
from behaviors that are detrimental to the
educational process of
the community; and to assist students in
identifying acceptable
parameters of their activities and consequences
of future behaviors.
The severity of the sanctions
imposed is intended to
correspond with the severity or frequency
of violation, as well
as the student’s willingness to recommit himself
or herself to good
citizenship through behaviors that fall within
the conduct
regulations of the University. The following disciplinary
sanctions may be
imposed upon a student responsible for
a violation either
singly and/or in combination:
A. Expulsion —
Expulsion is
permanent disciplinary separation
from the University
involving denial of all student privileges.
Expulsion shall be
effective on the date of notice of the expulsion,
or later if so stated
in the notice; and shall be entered into the student’s
permanent record
(transcript).
Students separated
from the University by expulsion may not
enter University
premises or University-related premises without
securing prior
approval from the Vice President for Student Life.
B. Suspension —
Suspension is
temporary disciplinary separation
from the University
involving denial of all student privileges.
Suspension shall be
effective on the date of notice of the suspension
or later if so stated
in the notice; shall be entered into the student’s
permanent record
(transcript); and shall prescribe the date
and conditions upon
which the student may petition for readmission.
Conditions for
readmission may include, but are not limited
to, disciplinary
probation for a specified length of time; non-residence
on campus; restricted
visitation to specified campus facilities;
and written statement
from an accredited mental health professional
or medical doctor
verifying the capability of the student
to function
successfully at the University.
Students separated
from the University by suspension may not
enter University
premises or University-related premises without
securing prior
approval from the Vice President for Student Life.
The suspension
notation will be removed from the student’s
permanent record, by
the Registrar, upon the student’s graduation.
The suspension
notation can also possibly be removed earlier by
petitioning the Vice
President for Student Life.
C. Residence Hall
Separation —
Residence Hall
Separation
involves removal from
the campus residence hall community for
conduct which clearly
demonstrated an inability to function
appropriately in the
residence hall living situation. Such separation
may be permanent or
for a specified number of semesters.
Such separation
prohibits accessibility to all or designated residence
halls and associated
dining facilities. Visitation will not be
permitted without
securing prior approval from the hearing officer
or panel. In no case
will separation be less than the remainder of
the semester in which
it takes place.
D. Disciplinary
Probation —Aperiod
of review and observation
during which a student
has been officially notified that his/her
conduct, although not
serious enough to warrant suspension, was
very inappropriate.
Subsequent violations of University rules, regulations
or policies (even
after a particular probationary period
expires) could result
in a more severe sanction.
Disciplinary Probation
is a status which may involve restrictions,
conditions or terms
imposed for a definite period of time.
Restrictions,
conditions, or terms of probation may include but are
not limited to:
ineligibility to participate in campus activities or
events; periodic
contact with a designated member of the campus
community;
restrictions on accessibility to University facilities
and/or housing areas;
and change of housing assignment.
Restrictions,
conditions, and terms will be imposed for a specific
length of time not to
exceed the length of the probationary period.
Failure to comply with
the terms and conditions of the probation
or additional behavior
in violation of this code during the probationary
period will likely
result in more serious disciplinary
action.
E. Disciplinary Warning
–
Disciplinary Warning involves written
notice to the student
indicating that specific behavior or activity
was in violation of
this code and that repetition of similar or
other unsatisfactory
behavior would likely result in more serious
disciplinary action.
Disciplinary Warning may also involve conditions,
such as those listed
above, that are intended to be educational
in nature.
F. Restitution –
Restitution is not
a fine; it is reimbursement for
actual damage to,
destruction of, or misappropriation of
University property or
property of any person which results from
conduct in violation
of this code; or is compensation for services
provided such as
alcohol education. The administrative hearing
officer or hearing
panel will determine the appropriate reimbursement.
G. Termination of the
Privileges of a Registered Student
Organization —
Termination of the
Privileges of a Registered
Student Organization
is the loss of any or all privileges of a registered
student organization.
Imposition of this sanction does not
preclude disciplinary
charges against individual members of the
organization.
H. Termination of the
Registration of a Registered Student
Organization —
Termination of the
Registration of a Registered
Student Organization
is the discontinuation of the registration of
the registered student
organization. This means the organization
can no longer
function. Imposition of this sanction does not preclude
disciplinary charges
against individual members of the
organization.
I. Creative Sanctions-
As deemed
appropriate by the hearing
officer, sanctions
such as reflective papers, fines, work projects or
other creative
sanctions.
J. Parental
Notification for Violating the University’s Drug or
Alcoholic Beverage
Policy-
When found responsible for violations
of these conduct
standards, the hearing authority may decide
to notify the
responsible students’ parents or legal guardians of
these violations as
allowed by Federal law. This will only occur
after the hearing
authority has discussed this possible notification
with the student and
the student is under 21.
VIII. Appeals
Appeals must be
presented, specifically described in writing to
the next level of
authority in the disciplinary chain of command.
An appeal is not a new
hearing. It is a review of the record of the
original hearing. The
accused student and his/her advisor has the
right to review the
accused student’s disciplinary file, including
any tape recording of
the hearing.
An appeal may be
dismissed if not sought on proper grounds.
If an appeal is
upheld, the case with procedural specifications
shall be referred to
the original hearing officer/panel. Any sanction
imposed as a result of
a hearing shall remain in effect during
the process of appeal.
The appeal officer has the authority, under
extenuating
circumstances, to defer the imposed sanction while an
appeal is in process.
In any event,
sanctions may not be increased as a result of an
appeal.
An appeal may be
sought on two grounds:
A. On a claim of error
in the hearing procedure. Appeals on such
grounds must be
presented, specifically described, in writing
within five days
(excluding weekends and holidays) of the
announcement of the
decision.
B. On a claim of new
evidence or information material to the case
which was not
available at the time of the hearing. Appeals on
such grounds must be
presented, specifically described, in writing
within five days
(excluding weekends and holidays) of the new
evidence having been
discovered.
The following is the
disciplinary chain of command:
Hearing Authority
Appeal Officer
Judicial Council Vice
President for Student Life
Dean of Students or
designee Vice President for Student Life
Vice President for
Student Life President
IX. Summary Suspension
A. Summary suspension
is an action which requires a student to
immediately leave
University property, and not return during the
suspension period,
and/or comply with other stated conditions for
a specified period.
Summary suspension may be imposed upon a
student by the Vice
President for Student Life or a designee when
there is reason to
believe, based on available facts, that the student
represents an
immediate threat to the safety, health, or welfare of
herself/himself, other
persons, or property. This summary action
is warranted by
potential or threatened danger or disruption, but is
utilized
only when the serious nature or immediacy of the threat
makes it impractical
to follow normal disciplinary procedures.
Summary actions
authorized by this policy include:
1. Temporary
suspension of a student’s eligibility for enrollment
or attendance, as well
as denial of the student’s access to
University facilities
or property. A student may be summarily suspended
for a specified period
of time or the suspension may be
scheduled contingent
upon certain events or conditions.
2. Temporary
suspension or limitation of a student’s eligibility to
enjoy certain
privileges, or participate in or attend certain events
(or certain kinds of
events) without the suspension of enrollment
status. This summary
action may prohibit a student’s presence on
University property or
certain facilities, or impose conditions
which must be met in
order for that student to enjoy certain privileges,
participate in
activities, or attend events.
3. Temporary suspension or limitation of a student organization's
eligibility to enjoy certain privileges, participation in or attendance at
certain events (or certain kinds of events), access to University
facilities or property, or university recognition.
B. When a student is
summarily suspended, she or he is given a
copy of this policy
and notice explaining the reason for, and duration
of the suspension, as
well as any conditions that may apply.
A student notified of
such summary action shall, upon written
request, be given an
opportunity to meet with the Vice President
for Student Life or a
designee within five business days from the
date of the request.
This meeting shall be held to consider only the
following issues
related to the summary action:
1. The reliability of
information alleging a student’s misconduct,
and
2. Whether the conduct
or surrounding circumstances reasonably
indicate the student’s
presence on campus or continued unrestricted
participation in
campus affairs would pose an immediate threat
to the safety, health,
or welfare of persons or property.
NOTE: It is not the
purpose of the meeting to hear information
concerning
responsibility of pending or possible charges against
the student.
C. Following the
imposition of summary suspension, standard
University
disciplinary procedures shall be provided as expeditiously
as possible. Unless
circumstances render the implementation
of standard
disciplinary procedures impossible or unreasonably
difficult, these
procedures shall be initiated within 10
University business
days from the effective date of the summary
action.
D. Any student who is
summarily suspended and returns to the
campus or University
property and/or violates other stated conditions
during the specified
period shall be subject to further separate
action and may be
treated as a trespasser. Permission to be on
campus for a specific
purpose (e.g., to take an exam, to consult
with the Vice
President for Student Life or designee, or to participate
in disciplinary
procedures) must be requested and obtained in
writing or by
telephone prior to any conduct contrary to the suspension
or conditions, and may
be granted by the Vice President for
Student Life or
designee.
X.
Disciplinary Files-Retention and Access
Disciplinary files are
retained by the Department of Student
Affairs and are
considered part of the educational record. A student’s
disciplinary file is
not released outside the University without
written consent of the
student. Disciplinary information will
be provided within the
University to individuals who are determined
to have a legitimate,
educational interest in obtaining this
information in accord
with the Family Educational Rights and
Privacy Act of 1974
(as amended).
A student’s
disciplinary file is retained for a specified length of
time. The maximum
sanction imposed determines how long a file
is retained before
being destroyed.
Permanently Maintained:
Expulsion,
Termination of
Registration of a
Registered Student Organization
Maintained Three Years
After Graduation:
Suspension
Maintained Until
Graduation:
Residence Hall
Separation,
Academic Misconduct
Maintained Until
Graduation or Seven Years from Date of
Hearing
(whichever is
earlier): Disciplinary Probation,
Disciplinary Warning,
Restitution
Maintained Three Years
from Date of Hearing:
Termination of
the Privileges of a
Registered Student Organization
The sanctions of
Expulsion and Suspension are the only disciplinary
sanctions that are
entered into a student’s permanent record
(transcript). A
student’s disciplinary file is maintained separately
from any other
academic or official file at the University. In cases
where the accused is
found not responsible, no official disciplinary
file will be retained.
When charges are dropped, due to insufficient
information, an
official disciplinary file will be maintained
until graduation or
seven years from the date of the hearing.
XI. Judicial Council
A. The Judicial
Council in addition to being a hearing authority
shall serve as an
advisory board to the Vice President for Student
Life with regard to
formulating and implementing appropriate
policies and
procedures in discharging responsibility for the total
operation of the
Student
Conduct Code.
B. Any recommendation
of the Judicial Council shall be forwarded
to the Vice President
for Student Life for approval and implementation.
When appropriate, the
Vice President will inform the
President of Winthrop
University who retains the right to make
final decisions in
accordance with the governance policy of the
institution.
C. The Judicial
Council shall consist of the following members: a
Chair appointed from
the faculty by the President of the
University, two
faculty members elected by the faculty, and two
students appointed by
the Council of Student Leaders. When
deemed necessary by
the Vice President for Student Life a four
person council may
hear a case.
It shall be the
prerogative of the President of the University to
appoint alternate
members of the faculty to serve during holidays
and the summer months.
Disclaimer
Please
see the
2009-2010 Student Handbook for the complete and
official text of the Student Conduct Code (pg. 36-42.) This website was created
for easy review, but is not a substitution for the full text found in the
Student Handbook.
|